\ problems theIndia is facing: October 2011

feedback


It takes only a sec to 'Feed us Back'. ThankYou.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

A BILLION GO HUNGRY ON WORLD FOOD DAY

One in seven people in the world went hungry on Sunday, which was observed as the World Food Day. Although the world can produce enough food to feed everyone, nearly a billion people ( 100 crores) go hungry every day or eat so little that it could well be called the Global Lack of Nutrition Day.

But for many of the millions going hungry, it is not war or natural disaster that prevents them from having enough to eat but simply not having sufficient money in their pockets.

Worldwide food prices have been high since 2006, when speculation by traders caused staples such as rice to rise by up to 320 per cent in a year. From 2005 to 2008, the worldwide average price of food went up by 80 per cent - and it is still rising. For those whose income was only ever enough to fund their subsistence, it has meant being priced out of life. A study of worldwide food insecurity by the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), published last week, estimated that a total of 925 million people were undernourished in 2010, two-thirds of whom lived in just seven countries - Bangladesh, China, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia and Pakistan.

The reports make it quite clear that rising food prices, stock market speculation in crop futures, conflict, climate change and corrupt, repressive regimes are the reasons why so many people go hungry - and not due to humanity's inability to grow enough crops. The findings come three months after the declaration of a major famine in the Horn of Africa, a glaring instance of several of these dreaded factors working at once. Few countries in East Africa are unaffected by the terrible drought in the region, but it is only in Somalia that persistent conflict and a lack of an effective central government have tipped the situation into a full-scale famine. Money has poured in from governments, agencies and individuals, all wanting to help, specially each of the 13 million people at risk of starvation. A lack of proper planning and prevention has once again created a crisis in East Africa, despite many thwarted attempts to break the cycle of famine. Kostas Stamoulis, director of agricultural development economics for the UN, said: "The long-term problem, with nearly a billion people going hungry across the globe, continues to be ignored. Emergencies affect hundreds of thousands of people every year but chronic hunger is a huge problem.". "We can't mobilise food aid to feed nearly one billion - it just isn't feasible."

The UN believes part of the reason for food shortages is a lack of investment in agriculture. In countries in protracted crisis, the FAO report says that only 3-4 per cent of funds for development and humanitarian assistance go towards agriculture. Mr Stamoulis said: "Some 75 per cent of those going hungry are rural people who derive most of their living from agriculture. We have neglected agriculture for too long. For years, people felt the way out of economic difficulties was to industrialise, but that meant agriculture was neglected in terms of research and in terms of rural infrastructure ... If we don't do something now we're going to face even more of these food security crises in the future. If you add in climate change and the fact that natural resources to produce food are declining, we'll be in pretty bad shape."

In Yemen, rising food prices and political instability have put 3.5 million people at risk of starvation. In Afghanistan, three decades of war and instability have had a similar effect. Almost one-third of the population do not have access to enough food to stay healthy. In many countries, humanitarian relief is complicated by politics. The Obama administration was last week accused of dithering over sending food aid to North Korea. A third of all children under five in the Communist country are chronically malnourished but the US says it will not give aid until the state guarantees it will reach the most needy and until there is an improvement in relations with South Korea.

FIGHTING HUNGER
  • World Food Day is celebrated every year around on October 16. It was on this day in 1945 that the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations came into being.
  • The aim of the day is to heighten public awareness on the scarcity of food and strengthen movement against hunger, malnutrition and poverty.
  • BY:Emily Dugan & David Randall

    Friday, October 14, 2011

    Have a look at this!

    Of all these miseries, One more here it is. The petrol prices hike every month and then never look back to tumble down.One litre of petrol in India is equal to 3 litres of petrol in some other South-East Asian country. What the Indian govt. is doing to take a control over this problem? Same is the case with the diesel and LPG gas price hikes.There is also a good probability that soon govt. is going to remove subsidies from diesel for the personal use in cars, as the rich people buy diesel cars rather than petrol ones to get good mileages out of their vehicle. The women in india is soon going to be in great trouble after the subsidies going to be removed from the LPG gas cylinders for the household. This problem is sustainig in the country for over the previous decades. Suggest solutions to overcome and control this menace.

    Sunday, October 2, 2011

    Villager asks PM: show me how to run a day on Rs. 26



    A villager from Ramban district of Jammu and Kashmir has sent demand drafts of Rs.26 — the Planning Commission's poverty line cut-off for rural areas — to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and Commission's Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia and asked them to show how to run a day with that amount.

    Darvinder Singh of Bhagote village, about 130 km north of Jammu, said on Saturday that the Commission's classification of the poor was an “insult to crores of the poor of the country.”

    LETTER

    He had also sent a letter with the DDs, according to a release, which he emailed to media houses across the State.

    ‘HOW WILL YOU FARE?'

    In his letter, Mr. Darvinder Singh asked the three leaders to run a day on Rs.26 and let the other poor people of the country know how they fare on this meagre amount.

    He said that despite soaring inflation, the Commission was making “illogical, unjustifiable and unrealistic claims.”

    “WITHDRAW AFFIDAVIT”

    He urged the Prime Minister to “withdraw the affidavit submitted in the Supreme Court to save further embarrassment to the poor.”

    PROVISIONAL PLACEMENT

    The Planning Commission recently told the court that the poverty line for urban and rural areas could be provisionally placed at Rs. 965 per capita per month (Rs. 32 a day) and Rs. 781 per capita per month (Rs. 26 a day).

    Source:The Hindu

    How little can a person live on?
    Ans: Rs.26



    The affidavit that the Planning Commission recently submitted before the Supreme Court stating that a person is to be considered ‘poor' only if his or her monthly spending is below Rs.781 (Rs.26 a day) in the rural areas and Rs.965 (Rs.32 a day) in the urban areas, has exposed how unrealistic ‘poverty lines' are. Some television channels assumed that the figures covered food costs alone and showed how they could not meet minimal nutrition needs at today's prices. These paltry sums, however, are supposed to cover not only food but all non-food essentials, including clothing and footwear, cooking fuel, lighting, transport, education, medical costs and house rent. The total is divided into Rs.18 and Rs.14 for food and non-food items in towns, and into Rs.16 and Rs.10 in the rural areas, and includes the value of food that farmers produce and consume themselves.
    The outcry against calling these destitution lines ‘poverty lines,' is justified; for true poverty lines are much higher than these, and show 75 per cent of all persons in India to be poor. Per head energy and protein intake has been falling for the last two decades as the majority of the population is unable to afford enough food. With 60 million tonnes of public food stocks, far in excess of the buffer norms, remaining piled up by mid-2011, the sensible policy is to do away with targeting and revert to a universal distribution system, combining it with an urban employment guarantee scheme. Unfortunately, the neo-liberal policymakers today ask the wrong question: “How can we reduce the food subsidy?” and not the right question: “How can we lift the masses of India from the current level of the lowest food consumption in the world, even lower than the least developed countries?”
    Members of the Planning Commission and the Tendulkar Committee are experts, so how have such laughable figures of minimum cost of living emerged from their statistical labours? The fact is that over 30 years ago the Planning Commission made a mistake of method, and the present Commission stubbornly clings to that mistake despite the fact having been repeatedly pointed out by many people including this author (The Republic of Hunger, 2004). The mistake was to change the definition of the poverty line and delink it from nutrition standards.


    The original definition of ‘poverty line' was a sensible one, based on an expert committee recommendation in 1979: using National Sample Survey (NSS) data on consumption spending, that in particular observed that the level of total monthly spending per person is to be called the ‘poverty line.' The food spending part of the figure allowed a person to obtain 2,400 kilocalories of energy a day in the rural areas and 2,100 kilocalories a day in the urban areas. Later the rural figure was scaled down to 2,200 calories. The Commission accepted the expert committee's nutrition-based definition but applied it only once, to the 1973-74 data, to obtain the correct monthly rural and urban poverty lines of Rs.49 or Rs.56 at which 2,200 or 2,100 calories were accessible, and found that 56 per cent of the rural population and 49 per cent of the urban population spent less than this, and so were poor.


    Then the Commission, for reasons unknown, changed the definition in practice, and never again directly looked at the total monthly spending which permitted nutrition ‘norms' to be maintained. This despite the fact that every five years the required information on this for every spending level was available — the physical quantities of food intake, and the corresponding daily average energy, protein and fat. The definition that the Commission actually adopted was that the 1973-74 poverty lines were to be adjusted for inflation using a price-index, regardless of whether the lines so obtained still allowed nutritional standards to be met. Price index adjustment is being followed for the last 30 years, producing the present absurdity of Rs.26 or Rs.32 as the rural or urban daily poverty lines.

    Why these economists should have such faith in the ability of price indices to capture the rise in the cost of living is not clear. Price indices are needed for short period adjustment and are used for dearness allowance calculation, but they do not capture the actual rise in the cost of living over longer periods of time. In 1973, the starting gross monthly salary of an Associate Professor in a Central University was about Rs.1,000. It was adequate, since ration cards could be used; on this income one could even use a car. Applying the Consumer Price Index for Urban Non-Manual Employees, which has risen 17-fold by 2011, the equivalent monthly salary for an Associate Professor joining now should be Rs.17,000, by the Planning Commission's logic. But this would not support the most modest middle-class lifestyle of four decades earlier. A newly appointed Associate Professor's actual salary today is three times that figure, thanks to successive Pay Commission recommendations.

    Yet, denying all experience and evidence, these economists assert that mere price-index adjustment is enough to obtain current poverty lines from those of 40 years ago. No wonder they have created a mess with their unrealistic estimates. An expressive, bucolic Bengali phrase is lyaje-gobare, or a ‘cow's tail smeared with dung' — this is a good description for official estimates. As time passed, the actual spending at which minimal nutrition could be accessed, the original definition accepted by the Commission, cumulatively diverged from the Commission's calculations based on its changed definition. By 2005, a rural person needed Rs.19 a day to access 2,200 calories, while at the official figure of Rs.12, she could obtain only 1,800 calories. (The Tendulkar Committee merely tinkered with the problem, raising the figure of Rs.12 to Rs.13.) An urban consumer needed Rs.33 a day in 2005 to meet 2,100 calories, whereas the official figure of Rs.18 permitted less than 1,800 calories. Today at the current official poverty lines of Rs.26 and Rs.32 for the rural and urban areas respectively, the minimal cost of living is even more seriously understated: the consumer can access even less food. State poverty lines vary, and in a number of States the energy intake the official poverty line can command is below 1,500 calories a day.

    One wonders if we will ever see honest estimates from official sources anywhere, since, by now, hundreds of economists are closely imprecated within a vast global poverty-estimating structure with the World Bank at its apex, producing increasingly misleading estimates every year in glossy reports. The World Bank's global poverty line is an equally large underestimate, for it is derived using “purchasing power parity conversion” from local currencies to the U.S. dollar, of these very same absurdly low local-currency official rural poverty lines of developing countries.

    What are the realistic poverty lines today based on officially accepted nutritional norms? The current poverty lines allowing nutrition norms of 2,200 or 2,100 calories in the rural or urban areas to be met, are at least Rs.1,085 a month (Rs.36 a day) and Rs.1,800 a month (Rs.60 a day) respectively. Since each full-time worker needs to support nearly two dependants, these correspond to a minimum daily wage of Rs.108 and Rs.180 respectively.

    Source:The Hindu

    Saturday, October 1, 2011

    Who is SONIA GANDHI??.. (Every Indian Should Know This)

    Who is Sonia Gandhi:
    Ther...e is officially no Sonia Gandhi. Her real name in passport is neither Gandhi nor Sonia. Its Edvige Antonia Albina Maino. Sonia is a Russian name and not italian. However, Antonia is an italian name and her passport is italian. Though she has married Rajiv Gandhi* she never accepted change of title officially. ( recall the time of turmoil in indian politics when Sonia Gandhi was trying to be the prime minister, but ultimately ManMohan Singh became her toy)

    *Rajiv Gandhi: Actually Rajiv Khan being the son of Firoz Khan and Indira Priyadarshani. Gandhi is an assumed title to sentimentally lure indians for their political benefit. They are muslims by religion.

    Father:
    Stefano Eugene Maino is socially the father of Sonia. Her father was a German(hitlers army). When Hitlers army went to russia they were captured and imprisoned. He was captured near St. Petersburgh and was imprisoned for 20 years. But he became a member of KGB and his imprisonment was limited to 4 years. When he came back from prison he gave russian name to his daughters. Social father because when she was born her father was in jail for 4 years. Biological father is unconfirmed.
    Mother:
    Paula Maino.
    Family:
    She had 2 sistersin Orbassano, italy
    Birthplace
    Sonia claims she was born in Besano, near Turin in italy. However, as per her birth certificate, She is actually born is Luciana, in the borders of Switzerland. A resort town for German soldiers during war.
    Education:
    She initially put forward to Indian Govt. that she studied in Cambridge University which proved to be fake. She submitted an affidavit that she studied english in Bell Education trust at Cambridge. Even this was proven to be fake and was found she never got any education after class five. She was a young girl with no formal education living five years in england. How did she support her livelihood for 5 years? Any wild guesses?
    Citizenship:
    She has not given off her italian citizenship. Indira Gandhi used her power to issue her an Indian Citizenship so that she can join Indian politics. She is holding an illegal citizenship in India. No action is being taken by Home Minister.
    Religion:
    Christianity.
    Bank Balance:
    Rajiv Gandhi and his family owned 2 billion USD in Swiss Bank as of November,1991. Benefitiary of death of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi was Sonia Gandhi.
    Family:
    Sonia's sister Alexandria(or Anuska) has 2 shops in Italy selling antiques stolen from India. Sonia used her power to smuggle indian artifacts through Air India flights uninspected.
    Sonia's son Rahul Gandhi, whose real name is Raul Vinci. He got admitted to Harvard in quota but was thrown off soon because he was incompetant. He has italian citizenship since his mother never gave up her citizenship. He cannot officially become the citizen of india or any politician in india as long as he doesnt give up his italian citizenship. Arrested in Boston airport for carrying 160,000 dollars cash, accompanied by Veronique (spanish). veronique is the daughter of Drug mafia leader. Rahul has also been accused for gang raping Sukanya Devi, whose petition to all courts in India have been rejected due to their political hold and the whereabouts of the family is unknown. However, the information is widely available online.



    **********Friends PLEASE DO SHARE this information (on your facebook,on your blog, on your twitter.. anywhere you like) with the people because only general awareness can cure this nation and the corrupt government will never reveal the truth ***********

    Source:Facebook Updates